CanDoAPIRoute's non-CRUD fallback branch compared a path-derived
permission name to the token's permission strings without checking
the request method. A token with projects.background (registered for
GET /projects/:project/background) could therefore invoke DELETE on
the same path. The same method-confusion affected the whole
/projects/:project/views/:view/buckets[/:bucket] cluster, where a
token with projects.views_buckets (registered for GET) authorized
PUT, POST, and DELETE on any accessible view's buckets.
The matcher also leaked CRUD permissions between parent and nested
sub-resource groups. When the request targeted a nested CRUD resource
(e.g. projects_teams, projects_shares, projects_users, projects_views,
projects_webhooks, projects_views_tasks, tasks_assignees, tasks_labels,
tasks_comments, tasks_relations, tasks_attachments, teams_members),
the matcher fell back from the specific group to the parent's permission
list but then looked the permission name up inside the sub-resource's
RouteDetail map. The effect was that a token holding only projects.read_all
also authorized GET on every nested projects_* list endpoint, and the
same held for create/update/delete and for the tasks.* family.
Rewrite the matcher to iterate the token's own permissions and accept
only when the stored RouteDetail's (Path, Method) matches the request.
This removes all the path-derived group guessing and makes the stored
detail the single source of truth. Preserve the tasks.read_all quirk
(one permission, two list endpoints) as an explicit two-path allowlist
inside the loop.
Extract a GetAPITokenRoutes accessor so the new property-based webtest
can consume the same snapshot served by GET /api/v1/routes.
Add TestAPITokenMethodMatching in pkg/webtests: using the live echo
router and the live apiTokenRoutes map, it iterates every advertised
permission against every registered route and asserts the matcher
accepts iff the stored (Path, Method) matches. Any future collision
introduced by a new non-CRUD route on a shared path will be caught.
After this change, previously-dead permissions like
projects.background_delete, projects.views_buckets_{put,post,delete},
other.avatar, other.ws and caldav.access start working as their UI
labels imply. Tokens that relied on the over-broad background /
views_buckets grants, or on cross-cluster CRUD bleed-through, will
lose the extra access - that is the fix.
Refs: GHSA-v479-vf79-mg83
The tasks_labels_bulk route was not recognized as a CRUD route by
isStandardCRUDRoute, causing it to be processed as a non-CRUD route
and registered in the wrong apiTokenRoutes group. API tokens with
tasks_labels permissions could not access the bulk endpoint, resulting
in a 401 error.
Fixes https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/issues/2375
Previously, the bulk api endpoint were explicitly filtered out. This meant that you couldn't use them with api tokens.
This change adds them to their "parent" token types as another option, allowing users to select and use them when creating api tokens.
Resolves https://community.vikunja.io/t/help-with-bulk-api-complete/2461
Previously, only routes which were coming from crudable entities could be used with an api token because there was no way to assign permissions to them. This change implements a more flexible structure for api permissions under the hood, allowing to add permissions for these routes and making them usable with an api token.
Resolves https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/issues/266
This explicitly adds download and upload of task attachments. Because these are not handled with the usual CRUDables, they were not picked up automatically.
Resolves https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/issues/112
kolaente
kolaente
renovate[bot]
Dominik Pschenitschni
Dominik Pschenitschni