This change modifies the migration `20251001113831` to flexibly parse bucket configuration filters.
This fixes this migration issue:
```
json: cannot unmarshal object into Go struct field bucketConfigurationCatchup.filter of type string
```
This occurred when a single `bucket_configuration` JSON array contained
mixed formats - some buckets with old string filters and some with
already-converted object filters.
This fixes a bug where old filters where not converted to the new json format correctly, leading to issues when trying to decode the raw filter string as json.
It is unclear whether that old migration had a bug or was not executed at all.
This change adds a new migration to fix all filters in views still stuck in the old filter string format.
Resolves https://github.com/go-vikunja/vikunja/issues/420
When the tasks were migrated from belonging directly to a bucket to only belonging to a view, I forgot to add the view in that migration, resulting in task buckets where the view was 0. These entries were not deleted when a task was moved between buckets, but the new task bucket relation nevertheless inserted. This resulted in tasks showing up multiple times on the kanban board.
This change adds a new migration which adds the correct project view id (as derived from the bucket) and fixes the old migration as well.
Resolves https://community.vikunja.io/t/no-longer-able-to-properly-move-tasks-between-kanban-columns/2175
BREAKING CHANGE: the position of tasks now can't be updated anymore via the task update endpoint. Instead, there is a new endpoint which takes the project view into account as well.
This PR adds reactions for tasks and comments, similar to what you can do on Gitea, GitHub, Slack and plenty of other tools.
Reviewed-on: https://kolaente.dev/vikunja/vikunja/pulls/2196
Co-authored-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>
Co-committed-by: kolaente <k@knt.li>
The change introduced in #2150 introduces a bug where a Team would be re-created every time a user logs in, as the check if a team already exists was based on both the unique `oidcID` and the `name`. This PR proposes to only base the check on the ID, as this should be unique.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Herrmann <daniel.herrmann1@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://kolaente.dev/vikunja/vikunja/pulls/2152
Reviewed-by: konrad <k@knt.li>
Co-authored-by: waza-ari <daniel.herrmann@makerspace-darmstadt.de>
Co-committed-by: waza-ari <daniel.herrmann@makerspace-darmstadt.de>